The novel that this film is based on is a work of extraordinary breadth of imagination. It consists of six different stories, though all linked through the themes, characters and other ancillary details, like birthmarks. The scope of the narratives is really breath-taking, and the links between them transform the book from just a collection of stories into a real, though unconventional, whole.
The basic theme of the book - and this theme has been retained in the
movie - is the strong oppressing the weak, the weak fighting back against this
tyranny. It is in every story, though treated in a variety of ways. Slavery and
freedom, bondage and liberty. You have these two poles right the way through
the film, and the conflict between them is at the centre of the narrative..
What the Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer - the directors of the film - have
done, very cleverly, is to cinematize the literary version of the story. The
visuals are impressive, the makeup is dodgy in parts but spectacular in others,
the directors seem more at home with the sci-fi stories but manage them all
well.
Where they really succeed though, is in the construction of the
narrative.In the book the stories are sequential, you read one, then the next,
then the next, whereas the film does a Magnolia and splits the stories up,
tells a snapshot of one, and then another, and then another, and so on, so it
feels like all the narratives are progressing together. They all reach a
conclusion more or less at the same time, so there is this slow, relentless
build-up towards a climax. If you can follow what's happening - and having read
the book helps - it is a thrilling experience.
I was riveted from
the very first scene. It was almost three hours long, but didn't seem half
that. I thought it was entrancing. Yes some bits of the book were glossed over,
perhaps some of the stories weren't concluded fully, even in three hours there
is not enough time to fit everything in. Despite that I found the slow
progression of each story, the interlinking of the narratives, the style of
editing where actions that took place in one story were immediately mirrored in
another, the visual beauty of the film, all of this was a feast for the eyes,
the brain, the emotions. A really remarkable piece of cinema.
Loved the book. Can't even imagine wanting to see the movie.
ReplyDeleteThoughts on Ghostwritten?
Ghostwritten for me was more experimental, and more disjointed. Less successful though interesting. Though in the right hands it could make an interesting film too.
ReplyDeleteLoved the book and the movie and agree splitting up the stories worked really well, I liked the way the same actors popped up in each story, Hugh Grant and Tom Hanks were unrecognizable in some roles.
ReplyDeleteYeah that was fun too, trying to spot who was who. Looking at the cast after, Halle Berry was actually a man in one story, which I missed completely.
ReplyDelete