Reading Henry James from a twenty-first century perspective is a very
strange experience. Written in 1904 The Golden Bowl is Henry James' last novel,
and was included in a list of the one hundred greatest American novels that I
read recently.
People certainly do not
write like Henry James anymore, and if they did they wouldn't get published.
For one thing, almost nothing happens in this 450 page novel. The plot can be
safely summarised in a two paragraphs.
Adam Verver, millionaire,
collector and widower, has a daughter, Maggie, who falls in love with and
marries an Italian prince, Amerigo. It is clear that Amerigo has married for
money, as he is impoverished. He had a relationship with another American woman,
Charlotte Stant, but as she was poor they couldn't marry.
Later, Adam, Maggie's
father, marries Charlotte .
Charlotte and the Prince resume their relationship, this time adulterously.
Maggie finds out and is unsure how to react.
And that's really it.
James' style though, is so dense, so obsessive about examining and poring over
every implication of every sentence of every conversation, and every detail of
every action, that scenes and conversations take ten, twenty, thirty pages to
describe.
His style is very opaque
too, sometimes it is necessary to read lines and paragraphs two, three, four
times to find out what they are saying. At times it is not even English, as we
would recognise it - "Only see me through now......and I leave you a hand
the freedom of which isn't to be said!" There are many sentences like
this, that use strange constructions and unusual combinations of words that are
either particular to the early twentieth century or more likely, of James' own
making.
And at times he is not a very clear writer. He will write a paragraph
talking about "she" and "her", and it will be unclear if he
is talking about Charlotte or Maggie. References are seemingly deliberately
ambiguous, conversations are vague and cryptic, and he hardly describes anyone
or anything physically so it is difficult to get an image of the characters. It is at times like reading through a fog.
In fact Henry James does exactly what you are told not to do in writing
courses, he doesn't "show" he "tells". Everything is
intellectualised, over explained, pulled one way and the other, he doesn't give
the reader any real leeway to make up his own mind. James is in charge, and he
tells you what to think.
Also, the world that the characters live in is very claustrophobic, the
action takes place in two or three grand houses in London , and one mansion in the country. And
the five or six main characters are all turned inward, in towards their own
thoughts and obsessions and betrayals, in to their own little privileged world.
It is difficult to identify with them.
They are people with immense amounts of money, and moreover people who
do no work whatsoever. They spend their time going for luncheon (it is never
lunch) and talking in drawing rooms and telling each other that they are
"beautiful", "splendid", "extraordinary".
The other thing they do best is not talk about what is really happening.
Everything about the affair between Charlotte and Amerigo is unspoken, Maggie
finds out but does her best to make sure that no-one knows that she knows, and
in fact never at any stage confronts anyone with her knowledge. They are a
small society devoted to covering up, to not talking about what is really
happening, to maintaining what James himself calls "the silver tissue of
decorum."
It is a bizarre world, and an intriguing novel, for all of the opaque
writing, the incomprehensible paragraphs, the endless sentences. Our view of
events is so dense, black-hole dense, with layer after layer of detail and
thought and analysis, one on top of another, that it is like going deep and
deeper still into the characters' motivations and beliefs and emotions.
Their relationships are much more complex than they appear on the
surface. Maggie and her father, Adam, have a definite Oedipal thing going on. There
is a hint from Charlotte
near the end when we finally get to some honesty, that the father-daughter bond
has made her own marriage to Adam difficult, as if she were always in
competition with Maggie.
Though of course we never hear about sex. We are left in the dark - just
as Maggie herself is, as she hints at later - as to whether Charlotte and
Amerigo's affair is a sexual one. We assume so, but it is never made explicit.
It is a hypnotic, at times irritating, slice of fiction, brought
together by the golden bowl of the title. This is an artefact that Maggie buys
on a whim, until she discovers the crack in its perfection, a symbol of the
flaw at the heart of their seemingly perfect lives.
The Golden Bowl requires patience, though does pull the reader along relentlessly, sucking you in to their airless world.
It may be just too much for a lot of people, too dense, too slow, too
claustrophobic, too incomprehensible at times, but it is also a strange,
unsettling, intriguing experience. Frustrating but with its own fascination.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please comment here....